Blog 2 b – The issue of Stakeholders

This week I tackle the important question of stakeholder management. Having worked in resource management in the past, I know the challenges that are met when dealing with conflicting stakeholder views. An important thing I took out of these readings was the challenge of weighing out stakeholder issues, priorities, and assess different ways to reach consensus.

What I find hard about this weeks ‘problem’ is how much weight do we give to each stakeholder in the process of decision making. Generally speaking, technical problems such as resource management are complicated and extremely scientific. In a case where NGOs are fighting the public who are fighting the government who is fighting multinational companies, each have their point of view, but only a small number have the expertise to actually contribute positively to the decision making strategy. Furthermore, we are hit with the issue of Sustainable Development, where the triple bottom line is given equal weight; environment encompasses society and economy.

On the other hand, stakeholder involvement is important. If governments and companies were able to do what they wished, we would be living in a different environmental landscape. Consensus is another issue that bothers me about this weeks discussion: I do not believe consensus is the right answer in most cases.

In my view, I think companies, governments, and scientists need to do a bigger part in education the public on the technical aspects of the decision making process. It is essential for the public to understand the risks associated with any given project, environmentally and socially speaking. Scientists need to have a bigger say in the EIA project, paving the way for better monitoring and regulating. Tradeoffs need to be better understood so that companies are not just compromising a problem with a less effective solution.

One Comment Add yours

  1. iest5003blog says:

    Hi Elie-Anthony,

    Nice post. You make some interesting points and the post reflects on the weekly content well.

    To strengthen your post I would suggest that you include an example of one of your points (perhaps something from the media that you’ve heard lately or a journal article) and a link to some further information about that example to back up your argument. For example you could find a article, case study or paper that highlights the importance of increased public education on the technical aspects of the decision making process which you mention.

    There are also a few minor typos so perhaps a quick proof before you post.

    I’ve included the Content and Creativity section of the marking Rubric (page 5 of the blog assessment sheet on Moodle) below for you in case you would like to review the criteria:

    Postings provide comprehensive insight, understanding, and reflective thought about the topic by
    – building a focused argument around a specific issue; or
    – asking a new related question; or
    – making an oppositional statement supported by personal experience or related research

    Postings present a focused and cohesive viewpoint that is substantiated by effective supporting examples or links to relevant, up-to-date websites or documents that enhance the information presented.

    Let me know if you have any questions.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s